Saturday, July 31, 2010

The very fact that he allowed a Mexican President to stand before our Congress to denigrate and insult ALL Americans is Treason!

To allow and encourage this foreigner and 9 other Latin American countries to sue a sovereign American State over its Constitutional right to protect its own borders against criminal acts and trespass is Treason.

To sue a sovereign State over its Constitutional right to protect its own borders against criminal acts and trespass is Treason.

To sue one state for political expediency, and not the others, is constitutionally illegal.

To refuse to secure any of our borders against criminal acts and trespass is Treason.

The Constitution of the United States is crystal clear on this.

Friday, July 30, 2010

Don’t Tread On Me: The Second American Revolution

.......Either America returns to its constitutional system based on real federalism, states’ rights, individual liberty and decentralized power, or it continues to slide toward the darkness of a socialist superstate......

The Shape of Things to Come

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Los Zetas drug cartel seizes 2 U.S. ranches in Texas

July 24, 11:18 AM · Kimberly Dvorak - San Diego County Political Buzz Examiner

In what could be deemed an act of war against the sovereign borders of the United States, Mexican drug cartels have seized control of at least two American ranches inside the U.S. territory near Laredo, Texas.

Two sources inside the Laredo Police Department confirmed the incident is unfolding and they would continue to coordinate with U.S. Border Patrol today. “We consider this an act of war,” said one police officer on the ground near the scene. There is a news blackout of this incident at this time and the sources inside Laredo PD spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Word broke late last night that Laredo police have requested help from the federal government regarding the incursion by the Los Zetas. It appears that the ranch owners have escaped without incident but their ranches remain in the hands of the blood thirsty cartels.

Laredo Border Patrol is conducting aerial surveillance over the ranches to determine the best way to regain control of the U.S. ranches, according to the Laredo Police department.

The approximate location of the U.S. ranches are10 miles northwest of I-35 off Mines Road and Minerales Annex Road. Just off 1472 (Mines road) near Santa Isabel Creek north of the city of Laredo, Texas.

The Los Zetas drug cartel is an offshoot of the elite Mexican military trained in special ops. The mercenary organization is said to include members of corrupt Mexican Federales, politicians as well as drug traffickers. The group was once part of the Gulf cartel, but has since splintered and now directly competes with the Gulf cartel for premium drug smuggling routes in the Texas region.

The new leader of Los Zetas is Heriberto “El Lazca” Lazcano and is considered the most violent paramilitary group in Mexico by the DEA.

Recently the drug organization has kidnapped tourists, infiltrated local municipalities and continues to smuggle narcotics into a very hungry U.S. market.

The violence south of the border continues to spin out of control and has left Nuevo Laredo, Mexico on virtual lockdown with businesses refusing to open the doors. Last week a particularly violent attack by the Los Zetas included the use of grenades and resulted in a dozen deaths and 21 injuries.

The hostile takeover of the ranches has met with silence with local and national media; however sources say they could be waiting to report the stories once the ranches are back in U.S. control. This journalist questions if this was a Middle Eastern terrorist attack if the media would sit on their hands.

Stay tuned for updates reports throughout the weekend.......HERE

Officials know nothing of rumored Zeta standoff on Mines Road

By Nick Georgiou
Laredo Morning Times
Published: Saturday, July 24, 2010 5:38 PM CDT
Local law enforcement was bombarded with calls from across the country Saturday asking about a report that the Zetas had taken over two ranches off Mines Road.

But officials with the Laredo Police Department, Webb County Sheriff’s Department and Border Patrol said they knew nothing about such an incident, while Erik Vasys, an FBI spokesman in San Antonio, said the agency does not comment on rumors.

The report, which spread like wildfire among blogs Saturday afternoon, appears to have initially been posted on a blog called Diggers Realm.

The blogger wrote that he got a tip from a San Diego, Calif., minuteman named Jeff Schwilk, who said that the Zetas, former enforcers of the Gulf Cartel, had crossed into the United States and taken over two ranches off Mines Road, about 10 miles northwest of Interstate 35.

Quoting Schwilk, the blogger wrote that there was a standoff between “the unknown size Zeta forces and the U.S. Border Patrol and local law enforcement on two ranches …”

The blogger wrote that the story was confirmed by anonymous sources at LPD.

But Investigator Jose E. Baeza, LPD spokesman, said he had not heard anything about the incident. Also, an LPD sergeant, who was on duty as a watch commander Saturday afternoon, said she had not heard anything about it either.

At about 4:30 p.m., Maru De La Paz, spokeswoman for Webb County Sheriff’s Office, wrote that the report about Zetas taking over ranches in Laredo is not confirmed. FROM

Multiple Ranches In Laredo, TX
Taken Over By Los Zetas
Full Coverage of the
Phoenix Rising Rally
Pictures And Speeches

Why The Los Zetas Ranch Story Matters - Confirmation And Why A Media Blackout?

Bookmark and Share

I am receiving many messages of concern that they don't believe that the story of the Los Zetas seizing multiple ranches in Laredo, Texas is true. They keep questioning the confirmation. They question why there are no visuals or pictures. "Where is the video!" they scream. So I will address those issues in this post.

First, let me clarify that I was also skeptical of the story when I initially heard word. It is certainly not because there haven't been armed intrusions into the United States before from Mexico. There have been a ton in the last decade, but there have not been any where they would hold onto a position. They usually leave after a standoff or upon discovery.

The situation has become different in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico over the last few days. There have been gun-battles through the streets and fragmentation grenades used as the government of Mexico tries to run the Los Zetas out of their stronghold there. People died and were wounded. The city was on lockdown and the US government issued warnings to US citizens in the area to remain indoors. With our lack of border security and porous borders, it is not beneath my intellect to believe that the Los Zetas could be forced into a retreat into US territory and attempt to seize a hideout.

Not only that, but "first contact" with me of the initial story was from none other than Jeff Schwilk, founder of the San Diego Minutemen, who had a confirmed source in the area of Laredo. With this in mind I decided to go with the story, but to remain cautious. I clearly stated on the story that it was not 100% confirmed. It remained that way all night.

I put out my feelers throughout the night to try and collect information and other credible sources to confirm the occupation of ranches in Laredo. I did not receive actual confirmation until this morning when I got word that Kimberly Dvorak of the Examiner had made multiple confirmations within the Laredo Police Department. Up until this point the story had not spread wide. There was no reason for the Laredo Police Department to crack down hard and keep things truly blacked out as there was no heavy interest from media.

However, upon that second confirmation and her running her story "Los Zetas drug cartel seizes 2 U.S. ranches in Texas" the story to me at that point was 100% confirmed. I changed my story to reflect that and released it to the world - spreading it wide. It has since gone viral.

(Since then I have learned Kim has no less than three sources inside law enforcement. Kim was also involved in the Acorn investigation with Breitbart, so she's no whipper snapper.)

Since that time many journalists have tried to get information from law enforcement in the area. With the flood of calls to the Laredo Police Department, others are now starting to receive dodgy kind of answers to their questions. This leads me to believe that there may indeed by a bona-fide news blackout as they try to resolve the situation.

We do have people looking into it and digging further; other things behind the scenes are going on for additional confirmation other than the current sources.

The question remains, what is a news blackout and why would it occur?

A news blackout is basically an order from the top down to disavow any knowledge of a situation or story. Deflect, disavow and deny. There are many reasons for this. They range from the legitimate tactical reasoning to the downright nefarious "cover up" reasoning.

Tactical reasoning is an easy one. It is so they can perform their duties with minimal intrusion. That one is very simple to understand.

Let us analyze the nefarious reasons though just for the heck of it shall we?

1. This would make the Obama Administration look horrible. Their lack of security along the border is well known. A breech of national security this large would create a firestorm of anger at the administration. Their aims to pass an amnesty for illegal aliens would be shot to pieces and all of their arguments against building true security in the form of a fence would go down with it. This would have ramifications in the upcoming November elections for congress.

2. There is currently a gubernatorial race going on in Texas. The current sitting governor, Rick Perry, is looked at as being weak on immigration. He stood up for in-state tuition for illegal aliens and has done little to crack down - or push for a crackdown - on illegal immigration in his state. This would destroy his "tough guy" and "tough on crime image".

3. Local congressional races in Texas. As everyone knows all of the members of The House are up for election. Some of those are open borders supporters. This breach of security would show that their continued fight against closing down the border in any way is flawed logic (as if it took this story to actually show that - the same story could happen again tomorrow).

4. Local sheriffs and elected officials could be made to look bad. There could have been mistakes made during operations that they don't want revealed. Or they could have not been properly prepared for them and this intrusion showed their incompetence.

5. Businesses. It's no secret that some agriculture and other businesses use low-skilled illegal alien labor to operate. They do this to avoid taxes so that they can make a hefty profit and avoid all of the hassles of insurance and the like. Strong business interests and wealthy individuals with influence could bring their power to bear down and cover things up to keep their cheap labor flowing.

6. General corruption. Some people in our government are beholden to or on the take from the cartels, Los Zetas or the Mexican government itself. After all, we seem to hear stories daily of someone or another being busted for being on the take. Imagine how many actually are on the take and just haven't been discovered.

Those are most of the nefarious reasons that I can think off of the top of my head as to why it would be covered up or blacked out.

I don't truly believe any of them.

Let me make that entirely clear.

I don't truly believe any of them.

I believe there is a blackout because local law enforcement and the Border Patrol are waiting for backup and authorization from the Federal Government to make any moves. Something like this does have cross border and international impacts. Things like that generally are handled by the federal government, as that is the primary reason we have a federal government in the first place.

The situation is relatively young and if they have the Los Zetas contained in one spot, there really is no reason to go all cowboy and charge into an unknown situation.

This sums up the current state of the situation and the path of how the story broke. I have no other knowledge at this time that is not contained here. We will find out soon the extent of this situation as it develops further. As I stated in the article - and it still remains - we don't know if it's only several members or a squad.

The story is still developing and I'll report more as I find out.

Posted July 24, 2010 06:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (30) |

Filed Under: | |




Comment by Erin Green Permission granted to post the following from Erin Green:

I got an alert on fb that the Mex. cartel Los Zetas have taken over several ranches near Laredo, near Mines Rd. and Minerales Annex Rd about 10 miles NW of I-35. Statement from Mr. Jeff Schwilk of the Minutemen: I can personally vouch that this info came in late last night from a reliable police source inside the Laredo PD. There is currently a standoff between the unknown size Zeta forces and U.S. Border Patrol and local law enforcement on two ranches on our side of the Rio Grande.

Remember Glenn Beck's amazing CPAC2010 speech? One of the highlights, IMHO, was Glenn Beck's reading of "A New Colossus," the poem inscripted upon a plaque at the Statue of Liberty at Ellis Island. Glenn Beck's reading gives it a whole new meaning, and I personally agree with his interpretation of it. If you haven't seen this yet, you're really missing out! If you have, here's an opportunity to enjoy it again.

Here's the video clip:

Friday, July 16, 2010

Tuesday, July 13, 2010


Police: Illegal Immigrants Raped 14-Year-Old Texas Girl at July 4th Party

Published July 13, 2010


A pair of illegal immigrants raped a 14-year-old Texas girl at July 4th party in Texas, where the teen was later found sitting naked in a bathtub, police said.

The victim told police that she went to an Independence Day party with her cousin in Horseshoe Bay, Tex., about 40 miles northwest of Austin, where she was left in a room with Anibal Escobar, 19, and Anael Martinez, 22, MyFoxAustin reported.

The two Honduran natives, who told police they are in the U.S. illegally, made advances at the victim and then raped her, she told police. The victim’s cousin discovered her in the bathtub and brought her home.

Escobar and Martinez were arrested early in the morning on July 9 and face felony charges of aggravated sexual assault, MyFoxAustin reported. Local investigators contacted Texas Rangers to assist in their investigation and translate, as none of the witnesses at the party or the suspects spoke English.

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Tuesday, August 7, 2007

Muslims: Little Concrete Piranhas.

I am amazed at the large number of Americans that just don't seem to grasp the idea that the Muslims are trying to take over the World.
We see what is happening in Europe (we, the ones educating ourselves on this growing problem) and it's now on our soil and yet most people still feel that it is not a threat.
I personally think part of the problem is the label that the marketing arm of their religion came up with - "the Religion of Peace". People hear that enough that they believe it. They do not want to believe that the Muslims are willing to kill any and everyone to get the world to see things their way.
Companies are giving in, people are giving in, communities and Governments are giving in to their wishes, lies and threats.

So, why the Concrete Piranhas title?
I thought of that the other day as I was talking to a good friend of mine.
I told him that we are standing on this beautiful concrete dam. We look out on the peaceful waters and see pretty sail boats and reflections of the sky and trees. Behind and below the dam lies a wonderful little city. Schools, churches, homes and office buildings all in symmetric lines below us. We look and think to ourselves that we are safe and everything is wonderful. Yet lurking under the water are these little concrete piranhas eating away at the dam. They don't make a ripple in the water, no splash or loud noise. Just tiny little bites taken out of the concrete dam.
Here we are standing on a huge structure that will give way to flood the city below and wash it away. Just like the Johnstown Flood, the town will be wiped out. Death, destruction and drastic changes are about to happen to hundreds of unsuspecting people.

The concrete piranhas are the Muslims all around us. They are slowly eating away at our dams (the Constitution, Bill of Rights and our Freedoms). In one town they are given this "right", in that town they are given something else. These little bits and pieces are going to add up and bring a wall of change over us if things continue to proceed this way.

A law in this town will change the laws of that state. The laws of a state will change the law of the land. They will use the little freedoms they gain to build a bigger part of the puzzle that they are trying to piece together. Slowly but surely they will build upon each success and we won't see it until it's too late.

How do we see the changes in "Small Town" or the changes in Middletown Minnesota, when we live hundreds or thousands of miles away? It's hard for us to see the little pieces being put together across the country. I think that this is where CAIR fits in. They are the puzzle keeper. They use their strength, knowledge and networking to put the pieces of the puzzle together.

We need to stay on top of things. We need to band together and thank God in Heaven that we have blog sites to help us find these pieces and try to undo what is being done before it's too late.

A letter to your councilman, representative or Congressman will do something. Educate yourself before you vote. We need to fight in any way that we can. Sitting on our asses and looking out at the pretty water is going to change us all. They are eating away at the concrete dam and most people don't even know it yet.

click to enlarge

click on bar to see details on the great tasting jihad treat

click to enlarge
click to enlarge
click to enlarge to read more about mo's urinal cakes

click to enlarge

Thursday, June 14, 2007

The lies we are told
The lies we buy

Please read the news brief below from CAIR, and then Rockdogs reply following.


Sylvester Brown Jr., St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 6/12/07

I'm usually one of the first to defend MSMers (mainstream media people) when conservative pundits label us irresponsible, sloppy or dangerous. After reading commentaries about a recent Pew Research Center study, I have to admit those pundits may have a legitimate gripe - at least in this case.

At first glance, Pew's study, "Muslim Americans: Middle Class and Mostly Mainstream," reveals a positive portrayal of our Muslim countrymen. Most reject "Islamic extremism" and believe that Muslims in the U.S. should adopt American customs.

Good news, right? Dr. Ghazala Hayat, a professor of neurology at St. Louis University, certainly thinks so: "It was a positive study, showing that most Muslims here are well-integrated and believe in the American dream."

Hayat is the past president of St. Louis' Interfaith Partnership and was the first woman to head the Islamic Foundation of Greater St. Louis.

Unfortunately, several writers offered a more ominous interpretation. Syndicated columnist Kathleen Parker admitted that most U.S. Muslims have assimilated but warned that "more than a few ... think suicide bombings are justified."

New York Post writers Douglas Montero and Andy Soltis warned in a story headlined "Time Bombs in our Midst" that "one out of four young U.S. Muslims believe suicide bombings against innocent civilians are OK."

Washington Times columnist Diana West urged readers not to "ignore a dangerous percentage" of young Muslims who approve of "skin-ripping, skull-crushing, organ-piercing violence in civilian life as a religious imperative."

Hold up a minute. Let's take a closer look. The survey asked more than 1,000 respondents if suicide bombings and other forms of violence against civilians were justified to defend Islam from its enemies. "Never justified" was the answer given by 69 percent, while 11 percent said "rarely" and 15 percent answered "often/sometimes."

Critics jumped on the combined 11 and 15 percent numbers, arguing that more than a quarter of young U.S. Muslims support killing civilians.

Is it feasible to believe that some U.S. Muslims, like other Americans, believe in the idea of casualties of war? Last year, the University of Maryland released the findings of polls conducted concurrently with Americans and Iranians. When asked whether bombings and other attacks "intentionally aimed at civilians" are justified, 27 percent of Americans said "rarely," 24 percent said "sometimes" and 19 percent answered "often."

By the way, 80 percent of the Iranians polled said such attacks were "never justified."

Funny, I don't remember panicked commentaries denouncing our cavalier attitude toward the death of Muslim civilians.



Again just like a good old CAIR newsletter I will start this reply with a quote from the religion of peace.

Sura 4:34 - A husband can beat a wife into submission if the wife refuses sexual relations. (Nothing says I love you like a good old-fashioned beating in the name of Allah)

Here we are again looking over the PEW POLL and CAIR is trying to twist the facts to make the Muslim community look good when we all know otherwise.

CAIR is amazed that the MSM and several blog sites have keyed in on the results that most people over look. Sure there are large numbers of Muslims (69%) that doesn’t want to see terrorism, suicide bombings and other forms of violence against civilians. But what CAIR is getting upset with is the fact that people are using the numbers to look at the ones that DO (11% said “rarely” and 15% said “often/sometimes) think it’s OK.

So CAIR is mad (what else is new) that we noticed that these numbers are ALARMING to us. Why are they not alarming to CAIR? So let’s give CAIR the benefit of the doubt and stick with the smaller number (11%). Not much, but take that number by JUST the people that they polled (1,000) and you now have 110 people!!! That is ALARMING TO ME.

OK let’s break that number of 11% down into something so simple that we can all relate to. You take your family to the ballgame (baseball) and there are 34,097 people in attendance (average attendance for MLB in 2006).
If we take the 11% figure and apply it to the ball game attendance you have 3,750 people in that ballpark with you that think it’s OK to BLOW you up (and your FAMILY) in the name of Allah.
So you don’t like baseball. Let’s go to a good concert, Dave Matthews Band, Green Day, whatever (your choice) and there are 49,000 in attendance. Go back to our simple math and that equates out to 5,390 people willing to kill you.
OK (last one) you don’t like baseball or a concert. You’re a southern red neck that just loves NASCAR (I do) and you go to Daytona for the race. In attendance there you have 186,000 people (average race attendance for NASCAR 2006) and again we use the 11% figure. We have 20,460 running around with bombs strapped to themselves thinking it’s OK to leave the race early and attend service with Allah.

There are approximately 2.35 MILLION Muslims in America! (11% = 258,500).

That figure is really large when you compare it to all the other religions that want to blow themselves up in the name of their God or beliefs. (Hindu, Catholics, Jewish and Protestants, etc)
There are ZERO, ZIP, NONE, NOT ONE, ZILCH people in other religions that think it’s OK to blow themselves up and take innocent people with them. Just the Muslims and their religion of peace.

But here is one thing that I think a lot of people seemed to have overlooked (quote from CAIR newsletter and Sylvester Brown JR’s Article).
Hold up a minute. Let's take a closer look. The survey asked more than 1,000 respondents if suicide bombings and other forms of violence against civilians were justified to defend Islam from its enemies. "Never justified" was the answer given by 69 percent, while 11 percent said "rarely" and 15 percent answered "often/sometimes."
I take that as they believe that EVERYONE but the MUSLIMS are attacking their religion and they are JUSTIFIED to do the suicide bombings and other forms of violence to promote their religion.

"Kill the Mushrikun (unbelievers) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush..." Sura 9:5.

Muhammad said, " No Muslim should be killed for killing a Kafir" (infidel).

And as for those who disbelieve and reject Our Signs, they are the people of Hell 5:11

The Muslims are on the OFFENSE, not the defense of their religion.
They are actively attacking the world and trying to get the World to conform to them and their Shari’a law.

CAIR and Sylvester Brown Jr. has a rebuttal to the poll (are you surprised? I’m not).

Last year, the University of Maryland released the findings of polls conducted concurrently with Americans and Iranians. When asked whether bombings and other attacks "intentionally aimed at civilians" are justified, 27 percent of Americans said "rarely," 24 percent said "sometimes" and 19 percent answered "often."

Here is my reply to the above statement. I believe that if you asked just about any American if they wanted to bomb or attack something or someone the first thing we would ask is “what did they do to deserve this”? Not what religion are they, are we defending our religion or does Allah (or some self-proclaimed “religious” leader) bless this attack?

Christians & Jewish martyrs say; "I will die for what I believe".
A Muslim martyr says; "you will die for what I believe"....

We do not go around blowing each other up in the name of a religion. We did not start this war with the Muslims (yes this is not a war on terror, it is a war against the ideology of Islam and the advancement of the religion of peace).
The Muslims are continuing to fight this war with the ENTIRE WORLD. SO don’t even reply that this is all because of America or American policy.
The Muslims are killing anything and everyone evidently “DEFENDING ISLAM” which I didn’t even realize was under attack. Did you know that Islam is just defending themselves? Doesn’t that justify all of this now?

Just look at the carnage they are doing on a daily basis in the name of Allah.

To me the website above is all the proof that you need to see that this is not a war against America or American policy. It is a war of religion. We have entered the CRUSAIDES all over again. Good against evil, God against the Devil.

And CAIR, if you’re worried about what people think of the Muslim religion and all the prejudice that you say you are experiencing. I have a little suggestion! Stop all the trivial little lawsuits and STOP KILLING INNOCENT PEOPLE IN YOUR GOD’S NAME!!!!

It’s not just a “radical” few that has taken over your religion either!
It is a very large number of them (but I personally think it’s really the entire religion).
So if you think we are making something out of nothing by singling out a “few radical” Muslims that have taken over your religion, think of this. These “ few radical Muslims” think it’s OK to attack, kill and murder us. Now do you start to understand OUR concerns over the results of the PEW POLL?
Your small number of “radical Muslims” has killed over 8580 people world wide since 9/11. Just this week (June 2nd thru the 8th) your Religion of Peace has attacked 56 times killing 347 people and critically injuring another 323 people.

If we look at that number of 11% again, then just look at the results of what a few “RADICAL MUSLIMS” that have taken over your religion is capable of doing. Surly even you can see the reason why we are so concerned.

You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure this out.

And again I will quote Grandma Rockdog “You are the company that you keep”!


P.S. CAIR, isn’t it OK for a Muslim to LIE to a non-Muslim? (Hint: Yes it is)
Then why should we believe anything you tell us infidels? Why should we trust you? Isn’t it very possible that the results of the PEW Poll are also nothing but lies and the numbers could very well be HIGHER (what I personally believe). Muslims would purposefully LIE to have the numbers appear smaller so the true threat that the Muslims pose would not be so apparent to us.

Al-taqiyya and dissimulation are words used for a practice of Muslims blatantly lying to non-Muslims. All but some of the most fundamental Muslims consider the act of Al-taqiyya or lying to non-Muslims to be a good work. This is very important when one remembers that, in Islam, salvation is determined by good works.

Please go to this site for more about lying to infidels (great article)